Soil and its Visual Preference in Iranian Artworks: Color Analysis in the Miniatures of the Herat School

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 PhD Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Humans possess diverse inclinations, some of which, due to their inherent nature and biological foundations, exhibit greater antiquity and permanence. This research seeks to understand how the human intrinsic interest to soil can be discerned through Iranian artworks. Since color analysis can reveal such tendencies, this topic is particularly applicable to visual arts, especially painting. Therefore, this study aims to explore the color selection in the miniatures of the Herat School by analyzing the quantity of colors used in them. This article use a descriptive-analytical research method, seeking to answer the following questions: What is the quantity and proportion of colors used in these miniatures? And which color is the most prevalent? For this purpose, 24 samples of miniatures from this school were selected, divided into two groups of 12: one featuring architectural elements and buildings, and the other depicting natural landscapes. The quantity of colors used in the selected samples was determined based on color type and the elements of the miniatures utilizing graphic and drawing software such as AutoCAD and Photoshop. The findings reveal that 59.5% of the total surface area in the first group (architectural elements and structures) belongs to the spectrum of soil tones. The remaining 40.5% is distributed among other color groups as follows: tiles (10.4%), stone (6.1%), coatings (5.9%), miscellaneous (2.9%), plants (3.2%), sky (2.7%), fabric (2.6%), ground (3.2%), plaster (1.5%), water (1%), cement (0.7%), and animals (0.3%). In the second group (natural landscapes), 67.6% of the total surface area belongs to the spectrum of soil tones. The remaining 32.4% is distributed among other groups as follows: plants (11%), stone (6.5%), coatings (5.5%), animals (4.3%), sky (2.7%), water (1.4%), and miscellaneous (1%). This indicates that soil tones dominate in both groups. Soil tones, a type of brown-beige color, are a distinctive feature of the Herat School, which is known for its extensive use of brown hues. It appears that in this school, attention was not merely given to the superficial properties of colors, but rather extended to the deeper conceptual meanings and symbolic representations of hues - those intrinsically connected to human beliefs and biologically adapted nature. The soil tone symbolized life continuity, intimacy, warmth, humility, and reverence for nature, while evoking sensations of joy, vitality, and health. It is hypothesized that this particular affinity for soil tones stems from both the adaptation of the human visual system to ancestral savanna environments and an innate human attachment to one's physical form. Furthermore, it may be posited that Timurid-era artists were aware of both the essential nature of soil tones for enhancing a work's warmth and their capacity to control chromatic turbulence, frequently resorting to various shades of this color to prolong the viewing experience of their artworks. The reverence for soil tones in these works demonstrates that the origin of appealing elements in refined schools like Herat extends beyond technical skill, diversity of forms, or composition. Rather, ancient factors rooted in biological adaptations, alongside psychologically and culturally derived elements, play significant roles in the aesthetic framework of these miniatures.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آژند، یعقوب (۱۳۸۷). مکتب نگارگری هرات. فرهنگستان هنر. الیاده، میرچا (۱۳۷۵). اسطوره، رؤیا، راز (رؤیا نجم، مترجم). فکور. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۵۷)
باس، دیوید (۱۳۹۲). روان‌شناسی تکاملی، دانشی نوین در کنکاش ذهن (آرش حسینیان، مترجم). مثلث. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۹۹)
باشلار، گاستون (۱۳۹۹). خاک و رؤیاپردازی‌های آرمیدن (مسعود شیربچه، مترجم). روشنگران و مطالعات زنان. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۴۸)
حسینی راد، عبدالمجید (۱۳۸۴). شاهکارهای نگارگری ایران. موزه هنرهای معاصر تهران. خیام، غیاث‌الدین ابوالفتح عُمَر بن ابراهیم (۱۳۵۴). رباعیات خیام (تصحیح محمدعلی فروغی). موسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر.
داروین، چارلز رابرت (۱۳۸۰). منشأ انواع (نورالدین فرهیخته، مترجم). زرین. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۸۵۹)
سروش، سارا؛ مزاری، نگار و خامنه باقری، طاهره (۱۳۹۵). مطالعه تصاویر خاک در سه قطره خون صادق هدایت به کمک روش نقد باشلار. مطالعات زبان فرانسه، ۸(۱)، 17-28. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086571.2016.8.1.3.1
سعدی، مشرف‌الدین مصلح بن عبدالله (۱۳۷۲). بوستان سعدی (گردآوری محمدعلی فروغی). ققنوس. سنایی، مجدود بن آدم (۱۳۸۰). دیوان (تصحیح مدرس رضوی، چاپ هفتم). کتابخانه سنایی.
حافظ، شمس‌الدین (۱۳۹۳). دیوان حافظ (گردآوری بهاءالدین خرمشاهی). دوستان.
فرناندز آرمستو، فیلیپه؛ اورتون، گری؛ مک کال، هنریتا؛ توب، کارل؛ کرتیس س. وستا و بیرل آن (۱۳۹۳). جهان اسطوره‌ها ۲: اسطوره‌های بین‌النهرینی، ایرانی، چینی، آزتکی و مایایی، اینکا (عباس مخبر، مترجم). مرکز. (چاپ اصل اثر ۲۰۰۳)
فغفوری، رباب و بلخاری قهی، حسن (۱۳۹۵). نمود کتیبه‌های معماری در نگاره‌های ایرانی تحلیلی بر نمونه‌های مکتب هرات و آثار بهزاد. پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، ۱۳(۴)، 112-۱31۲. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-614-fa.html
کارترایت، جان (۱۳۸۷). تکامل و رفتار انسان (بهزاد سروری، مترجم). جهاد دانشگاهی. (چاپ اصل اثر ۲۰۰۰)
گات، بریس و مک آیور لوپس دومینیک (۱۳۸۴). دانشنامه زیبایی‌شناسی (منوچهر صانعی دره بیدی، امیرعلی نجومیان، شیده احمدزاده، بابک محقق، مسعود قاسمیان و فرهاد ساسانی، مترجمین). فرهنگستان هنر. (چاپ اصل اثر ۲۰۰۱)
گاتشال، جاناتان (۱۳۹۵). حیوان قصه‌گو (عباس مخبر، مترجم). مرکز. (چاپ اصل اثر ۲۰۱۲)
گایز، دارلین (۱۳۸۴). تازه‌ترین کشفیات درباره پیدایش و مرگ دایناسورها (بهروز بیضایی، مترجم). قدیانی. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۹۶)
گری، بازل (۱۳۸۵). نقاشی ایرانی. (عربعلی شروه، مترجم). دنیای نو. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۳۰)
گرین، راجر لنسلین (۱۳۹۲). اساطیر یونان: از آغاز آفرینش تا عروج هراکلیس (عباس آقاجانی، مترجم). سروش. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۵۸)
لعل شاطری، مصطفی (۱۳۹۵). ناتورالیست رئالیسمی در آثار کمال‌الدین بهزاد (مطالعه موردی: هرات عصر تیموری). خراسان بزرگ، ۷(۲۴)، 15-28. https://journals.imamreza.ac.ir/article_137869.html
محمدزاده، مهدی و مسینه اصل، مریم (۱۳۹۵). معماری در نقاشی مکتب هرات. فیروزه اسلام، ۲(۲)، 27-45. http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-48-fa.html
مک کال، هنریتا (۱۳۸۹). اسطوره‌های بین‌النهرینی (عباس مخبر، مترجم). مرکز. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۹۰)
وحدت طلب، مسعود و یغموری، اکرم (۱۴۰۳). بررسی همانندی سرپوش‌ها در الگوهای پوششی و معماری (گزارش همانندی هشت الگوی سرپوش انسانی با سرپوش‌های معماری در کاخ توپکاپی). هنر و تمدن شرق، ۱۲(۴۳)، 6-17. https://doi.org/10.22034/JACO.2023.405487.1330
ویلسون، ادوارد (۱۳۹۸). در جستجوی طبیعت، غریزه زیست گرایی (کاوه فیض‌اللهی، مترجم). نشر نو. (چاپ اصل اثر ۱۹۹۶)
Albers, A. M., Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Nascimento, S. M. C. (2020). An independent contribution of colour to the aesthetic preference for paintings. Vision Research, 174, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.005
Azhand, Y. (2008). The Herat school of painting [Maktab-e Negargari-ye Herat]. Academy of Arts. (in Persian)
Bachelard, G. (2020). Earth and reveries of repose [Khak va royapardazi-haye amidan] (M. Shirbacheh, Trans.). Roshangaran va Motaleat-e Zanan. (Original work published 1948) (in Persian)
Buss, D. M. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind [Ravanshenasi-ye takamoli, daneshi novin dar kankash-e zehn] (Vol. 1) (A. Hosseinian, Trans.). Mosallas. (Original work published 1999) (in Persian)
Cartwright, J. (2008). Evolution and human behavior [Takamol va raftar-e ensan] (B. Sarvari, Trans.; A. Vahabzadeh, Ed.). Jihad Daneshgahi. (Original work published 2000) In Persian.
Darwin, C. R. (2001). On the origin of species [Mansha-ye anva] (N. Farhikhteh, Trans.). Zarrin. (Original work published 1859) (in Persian)
Dewey, J. (1987). Art as experience. Southern Illinois University Press.
Eliade, M. (1996). Myth, dream, and mystery [Ostoureh, roya, raz] (R. Najm-e Fakour, Trans.). Fakoor. (Original work published 1957) (in Persian)
Eysenck, H. J. (1941). A critical and experimental study of color preferences. The American Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417683
Faghfouri, R., & Belkhari Ghehi, H. (2016). The manifestation of architectural inscriptions in Iranian paintings: An analysis of the Herat school and Behzad’s works [Nemoud-e katibeh-haye memari dar negareh-haye irani tahlili bar nemouneh-haye maktab-e herat va asar-e behzad]. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 13(4), 112–131. (in Persian) http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-614-fa.html
Feller, C., Landa, E. R., Toland, A., & Wessolek, G. (2015). Case studies of soil in art. Soil, 1(2), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-543-2015
Fernández-Armesto, F., Urton, G., McCall, H., Taube, K., Curtis, V. S., & Birrell, A. (2014). World of myths 2: Mesopotamian, Iranian, Chinese, Aztec, Mayan, and Incan myths [Jahan-e ostoureh-ha 2: Ostoureh-haye bin-on-nahreyni, irani, chini, azteki va mayayi, inka] (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Markaz. (Original work published 2003) (in Persian)
Flugel, J. C. (1940). The psychology of clothes. Hogarth Press.
Gaut, B., & Lopes, D. M. (2005). The Routledge companion to aesthetics [Daneshnameh-ye zibaee shenasi] (M. Sanei Darehbidi, A. Nojoumian, S. Ahmadzadeh, B. Mohaghegh, M. Ghasemian, & F. Sasani, Trans.). Academy of Arts. (Original work published 2001) (in Persian)
Gayis, D. (2005). The latest discoveries about the origin and death of dinosaurs [Tazeh-tarin kashfiyat darbareh-ye peydayesh va marg-e daynasour-ha] (B. Beyzaei, Trans.). Ghadiani. (Original work published 1996) (in Persian)
Gottschall, J. (2016). The storytelling animal [Heyvan-e ghesseh-goo] (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Markaz. (Original work published 2012) (in Persian)
Gray, B. (2006). Persian painting [Naghashi-ye irani] (A. Sharveh, Trans.). Donyaye No. (Original work published 1930) (in Persian)
Green, R. L. (2013). Greek myths: From the beginning of creation to the ascent of Heracles [Asatir-e yunan: az aghaz-e afarinesh ta orooj-e heracles] (A. Aghajani, Trans.). Soroush. (Original work published 1958) (in Persian)
Guthrie, E. S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press.
Hafez, S. (2014). The Divan of Hafez [Divan-e hafez] (B. Khorramshahi, Ed.). Doostan. (in Persian)
Hosseini Rad, A. (2005). Masterpieces of Persian painting [Shahkar-haye negargari-ye iran]. Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art. (in Persian)
Hradil, D., Grygar, T., Hradilová, J., & Bezdicka, P. (2003). Clay and iron oxide pigments in the history of painting. Applied Clay Science, 22(5), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00076-0
Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17(15), R623–R625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 367–375). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0034
Keskitalo, K., Knaapila, A., Kallela, M., Palotie, A., Wessman, M., Sammalisto, S., Peltonen, L., Tuorila, H., & Perola, M. (2007). Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: Identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/86.1.55
Khayyam, G. A. (1975). Rubaiyat of Khayyam [Robaiyat-e khayyam] (M. A. Foroughi, Ed.). Amirkabir Publications. (in Persian)
Koo, J., & Dimes, J. (2010). HC27 generic soil profile database (Version 1) [Data set]. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20299
La’l Shateri, M. (2016). Naturalist realism in the works of Kamal al-Din Behzad (Case study: Timurid Herat) [Naturalist realisami dar asar-e kamal-oddin behzad (motale-ye moredi: herat-e asr-e teymouri)]. Great Khorasan, 7(24), 15–28. (in Persian) https://journals.imamreza.ac.ir/article_137869.html
McCall, H. (2010). Mesopotamian myths [Ostoureh-haye bin-on-nahreyni] (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Markaz. (Original work published 1990) (in Persian)
Mohammadzadeh, M., & Masineh Asl, M. (2016). Architecture in the paintings of the Herat school [Memari dar naghashi-ye maktab-e herat]. Firoozeh Islam, 2(2), 27–45. (in Persian) http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-48-fa.html
Nascimento, S. M. C., Albers, A. M., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2021). Naturalness and aesthetics of colors—preference for color compositions perceived as natural. Vision Research, 185, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2021.03.010 Pakzad, Z. (2017). Color structure in Persian
painting. Review of European Studies, 9(1), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n1p1
Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 107(19), 8877–8882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906172107
Polzella, D. J., Hammar, S. H., & Hinkle, C. W. (2005). The effects of color on viewers’ ratings of painting. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.2190/ECK9-C18E-RQN9-7WNE
Reeder, A. L., Losua, E., Grey, A. R., & Hammond, V. A. (2014). Validity and reliability of the Munsell soil color charts for assessing human skin color. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 23(10), 2041–2047. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0269
Rutherford, M. C., Mucina, L., Lotter, M. C., & Bredenkamp, G. J. (2006). Savanna Biome. South African National Biodiversity Institute, 9, 440–529. https://researchgate.net/publication/236982063_Savanna_Biome
Saadi, M. M. (1993). Bostan of Saadi [Bostan-e saadi] (M. A. Foroughi, Ed.). Ghoghnoos. (in Persian)
Sanai, M. (2001). Divan (M. Razavi, Ed.; 7th ed.). Sanai Library. (in Persian)
Soroush, S., Mazari, N., & Khameneh Bagheri, T. (2016). A study of earth images in Sadegh Hedayat's "Three Drops of Blood" using Bachelard's critical method [Motale-ye tasavir-e khak dar se ghatreh khoun-e sadegh hedayat be komak-e ravesh-e naghd-e bachelard]. Revue des Études de la Langue Française, 8(1), 17–28. (in Persian) https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086571.2016.8.1.3.1
Tu, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2016). Consumer happiness derived from inherent preferences versus learned preferences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.013
Ugolini, F. (2009). Soil colors, pigments and clays in paintings. Soil and Culture, 5, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2960-7_5
Van Breemen, N. (2010). Transcendental aspects of soil in contemporary visual arts. Soil and Culture, 3, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2960-7_3
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modrono, C., Nadal, M., Rostrop, N., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 110(2), 10446–10453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301227110
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modrono, C., Rostrop, N., Skov, M., Corradi, G., & Nadal, M. (2017). Preference for curvilinear contour in interior architectural spaces: Evidence from experts and nonexperts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000150
Vodyanitskii, Y. N., & Kirillova, N. (2016). Conversion of Munsell color coordinates to CIE-Lab* system: Tables and calculation examples. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin, 17(4), 3–11.
Wahdattalab, M., & Yaghmouri, A. (2024). Examining the similarity of headgears in clothing and architectural patterns (Report on the similarity of eight human headgear patterns with architectural headgears in Topkapi Palace) [Barresi-ye hamandishi-ye sarpoush-ha dar olgu-haye pousheshi va memari]. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 12(43), 6–17. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/JACO.2023.405487.1330
Wilson, E. O. (2019). In search of nature: The biophilia hypothesis [Dar jostojoo-ye tabiat, gharizeh-ye zist-garayi] (K. Feyzollahi, Trans.). Nashr-e Now. (Original work published 1996) (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687416040074.