Exploring the Evolution of Contemporary Museum Interactions through Convergence with Technology, with an Emphasis on New Contemporary Arts

Mirazizi, Seyed Mahmood; Goudarzi, Mostafa

doi:10.22059/jfava.2026.399519.667535

Exploring the Evolution of Contemporary Museum Interactions through Convergence with Technology, with an Emphasis on New Contemporary Arts

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

seyed mahmood mirazizi ¹

Mostafa Goudarzi ²

¹ PhD in Visual Arts, Department of Advanced Art Studies, School of Visual Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

² Professor, Department of Advanced Art Studies, School of Visual Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jfava.2026.399519.667535

Abstract

Some of Contemporary museums are undergoing a profound transformation by integrating emerging digital technologies to enhance visitor experiences, preserve cultural heritage, and redefine their social roles. This convergence represents a fundamental change in how museums conceptualize, present, and interpret contemporary art. However, despite growing scholarly interest in digital museology, comprehensive research remains limited on how multiple technologies—particularly robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and artificial intelligence (AI)—simultaneously affect museum practices and the emergence of new forms of contemporary art. This study addresses that gap through three questions: 1) How have these technologies transformed the exhibition and interpretation of contemporary art? 2) How has the convergence of technology and art reshaped the audience’s role in artistic experience? 3) What are the applications, benefits, and challenges of each technology in contemporary museums? This applied-developmental, descriptive-analytical research adopted a qualitative approach. Data were collected through a comprehensive literature review. The search strategy included Google Scholar, specialized museum journals, institutional reports, and related scholarly sources. The findings indicate that AI-based personalization algorithms enable museums to tailor content and visitor journeys according to individual preferences, prior knowledge, and behavioral patterns. Virtual reality and augmented reality facilitate immersive, multilayered interpretation and allow visitors to experience artworks beyond physical constraints, including entering a painter’s perspective or visualizing creative processes. Robotics, particularly interactive guide robots, introduces new forms of physical interaction, especially in performance and movement-based art. Collectively, these technologies transform audiences from passive observers into active participants, co-creators of meaning, and, in some contexts, temporary artists. IoT-based intelligent monitoring systems equipped with distributed sensor networks continuously track temperature, humidity, light levels, and airborne pollutants, providing real-time alerts for preventive conservation. Such systems help protect collections from biological threats, including insects and fungi, as well as chemical degradation. Advanced AI security systems further integrate facial recognition, anomaly detection, and predictive analytics to safeguard collections against theft, vandalism, and natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods. In museum education, emerging technologies have transformed teaching by enabling experiential, situated, and multimedia learning beyond traditional educational models. VR supports immersive programs in which learners explore reconstructed historical contexts and artistic processes from first-person perspectives. AR overlays supplementary information, including artists’ biographies, technical details, and critical interpretations, directly onto displayed works through mobile devices or smart glasses. Remote-visit technologies, accelerated by pandemic-era adaptations, allow global audiences to access collections despite geographic limitations, thereby expanding inclusive cultural engagement. Most importantly, digital technologies have become generative forces in contemporary art rather than merely presentation tools. AI algorithms can generate artworks, collaborate with human artists, and transform existing themes. VR and AR also enable virtual reconstructions of damaged or destroyed works, including self-destructive art associated with Gustav Metzger, thereby reviving ephemeral artistic forms in immersive environments. Comparative analysis shows that AI is the only technology with an active presence across all major areas of museology—audience engagement, conservation, education, access, and creativity—and across diverse branches of contemporary art, from performance to self-destructive practices. The study concludes that each technology offers distinct value: robotics enables physical interaction; IoT supports intelligent monitoring and sustainable management; AR enriches contextual and immersive experiences; VR expands experiential interpretation; and AI provides integrated intelligence capable of personalizing, predicting, and creating. Their convergence is not merely additive but synergistic. AI combined with IoT enables predictive preservation, AI with VR produces responsive immersive environments, and robotics with AR facilitates interactive physical–virtual arrangements. Together, these technologies support multilayered interpretation, contextual enrichment, and the reconstruction of damaged or ephemeral works. The audience’s role has consequently shifted from passive receiver to active agent, participant in meaning-making, and co-creator of artistic significance. Nevertheless, important challenges remain, including implementation costs, the digital divide, technological obsolescence, privacy and ethical concerns, and the risk that authentic museum experiences may be reduced to entertainment. This research contributes a comprehensive framework for understanding technology-driven changes in museology and their implications for contemporary art production, exhibition, curation, and reception. Future research should examine longitudinal effects on visitor behavior, institutional readiness, ethical governance, accessibility, and changing patterns of authorship. Comparative studies across cultural contexts may further identify sustainable models for technologically mediated artistic engagement and participation. These developments also challenge established assumptions about curatorial authority, authenticity, and the boundaries between artwork, interface, and institutional infrastructure. As digital systems increasingly mediate encounters with collections, curators must consider how algorithmic selection, personalization, and automated interpretation influence what visitors see and how they understand it. Consequently, technological integration should not be evaluated solely in terms of efficiency or novelty, but also according to its cultural, ethical, and aesthetic implications. Museums need interdisciplinary strategies that bring together curators, artists, conservators, educators, designers, and technology specialists. Such collaboration can ensure that innovation remains aligned with institutional missions while preserving critical reflection, accessibility, and meaningful human participation across museum contexts.

Keywords

Contemporary Museums

New arts

Robots

Virtual Reality

Augmented Reality

Internet of Things

Artificial Intelligence

Subjects

Generality in Arts

Afkham, A. (2014). A reference architecture for IoT [Slides]. SlideShare. https://www.slideshare.net/wso2.org/io-t-referencearchitecturewebinar

Agrawal, O. P. (2007). Essentials of conservation and museology. Sundeep Prakashan.

Anadol, R., & Kivrak, P. (2023). AI, Architecture, and Performance: Walt Disney Concert Hall Dreams. In Choreomata (pp. 379-389). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Awadalla, R. R. (2023). The application of mixed reality technology as innovative approach in museums. Journal of Design Sciences and Applied Arts, 4(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.21608/jdsaa

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ruth/year4VEs/Resources/ARpresence.pdf

Bautista, S. S. (2013). Museums in the digital age: Changing meanings of place, community, and culture. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Bedno, J., & Bedno, E. (1999). Museum exhibitions: Past imperfect, future tense. Museum News, 78(5), 38-43. https://mps.uchicago.edu/docs/articles/Past%20Imperfect%2C%20Future%20Tense.pdf

Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1031445.pdf

Bhattacharya, I. (2019). Scientific technology: Relevance and role of ‘Internet of Things (IoT)’ in museum. Journal of Indian Museums, 72(1), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13764.37762

Black, G. (2012). Transforming museums in the twenty-first century. Routledge.

Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., ... & Thrun, S. (1999). Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot. Artificial Intelligence, 114(1-2), 3–55.

https://publications.ri.cmu.edu/storage/publications/pub_files/pub1/burgard_w_1999_2/burgard_w_1999_2.pdf

Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6

Carrozzino, M., & Bergamasco, M. (2010). Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001

CBC News. (2018, January 28). Art exhibit combines augmented reality and classic paintings.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/art-exhibit-combines-augmented-reality-and-classic-paintings-1.4452158

Chen, S., Han, X., Bilgihan, A., & Okumus, F. (2021). Customer engagement research in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(7), 871–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1903644

Copenhagen Contemporary. (2025). Soft robots. https://copenhagencontemporary.org/en/soft-robots/

Danaei, D., Jamali, H. R., Mansourian, Y., & Rastegarpour, H. (2020). Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks. Computers & Education, 153, Article 103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103900

Deutsches Museum Bonn. (2023, May 5). Erlebnisraum zu Robotik und Mobilität. https://www.deutsches-museum.de/bonn/presse/meldung/erlebnisraum-robotik-und-mobilitaet

Deutsches Museum. (n.d.). Homepage. https://www.deutsches-museum.de.

Deuze, M. (2009). Media industries, work and life. European Journal of Communication, 24(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323109345523

Erbay, M. (2017). Yeni nesil teknolojiler ile müzelerde eğitim. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 46(214), 255–268. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/milliegitim/article/405935

Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Adams, M. (2006). Living in a learning society: Museums and free-choice learning. A Companion to Museum Studies, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996836.ch19

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9

Giangreco, I., Sauter, L., Parian, M. A., Gasser, R., Heller, S., Rossetto, L., & Schuldt, H. (2019). Virtue: A virtual reality museum experience. In Companion Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 119–120). Association for Computing Machinery.

Giannini, T., & Bowen, J. P. (2022). Museums and digital culture: From reality to digitality in the age of COVID-19. Heritage, 5(1), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5010011

Heisenberg, W. (1991). Physics and philosophy (M. Khatami, Trans.). Elmi Publications. (Original work published 1958) (in Persian)

Heraklion Museum. (n.d.). Homepage. https://www.heraklionmuseum.gr

Hetherington, K. (2020). Foucault and the museum. In A. Witcomb & K. Message (Eds.), Museum theory (pp. 21–40). Wiley-Blackwell.

Imperial War Museums. (n.d.). Homepage. https://www.iwm.org.uk/

Jahshaka. (n.d.). HTC recreated the Mona Lisa in 3D for the Louvre’s Da Vinci exhibition.
https://www.jahshaka.com/htc-recreated-the-mona-lisa-in-3d-for-the-louvres-da-vinci-exhibition/

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.

Karayılanoğlu, G., & Arabacıoğlu, B. C. (2020). Digital interactive experiences in contemporary art museums. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 10(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.7456/11004100/007

Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. K. (2022). Emotions and colors in a design archiving system: Applying AI technology for museums. Applied Sciences, 12(5), 2467. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052467

Kiourexidou, M., & Stamou, S. (2025). Interactive heritage: The role of artificial intelligence in digital museums. Electronics, 14(9), Article 1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14091884

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). FT Press.

Kopetz, H., & Steiner, W. (2022). Internet of things. In Real-time systems: Design principles for distributed embedded applications (pp. 325–341). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89828-1_13

LaValle, S. M. (2023). Virtual reality. Cambridge University Press.

Malraux, A. (1996). Le musée imaginaire. Gallimard. (Original work published 1947)

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007

Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.004

Mazuryk, T., & Gervautz, M. (1996). Virtual reality: History, applications, technology and future (Technical Report TR-186-2-96-06). Vienna University of Technology. https://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/publications/1996/mazuryk-1996-VRH/

Memor Museum. (2024). Sanxingdui: Encounter. https://www.memormuseum.com/exhibition/sanxingdui-encounter

Memor Museum. (n.d.). Exhibition. https://www.memormuseum.com/exhibition

Museum of Modern Art. (n.d.). Exhibitions (5535). https://www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/5535

Nake, F. (2019). Georg Nees & Harold Cohen: Re:tracing the origins of digital media. In O. Grau, J. Hoth, & E. Wandl-Vogt (Eds.), Digital art through the looking glass: New strategies for archiving, collecting and preserving in digital humanities (pp. 27–48). Edition Donau-Universität. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13340

National Museum of Denmark. (n.d.). Museums and palaces. https://en.natmus.dk/museums-and-palaces/

NCF Catalyst. (n.d.). Exploring new exhibits at the Dali Museum. https://ncfcatalyst.com/exploring-new-exhibits-at-the-dali-museum/

Norris, D. (2015). The Internet of Things: Do-it-yourself at home projects for Arduino, Raspberry Pi and BeagleBone Black. McGraw-Hill Education.

Orford, E. J. H. (2008). The creative spirit: Stories of 20th century artists. Baico Publishing.

Peng, Y., Chen, C., & Huang, G. (2024). Universal visual decomposer: Long-horizon manipulation made easy. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 4756–4762). IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610198

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Raymond, E. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly Media.

Rose, K., Eldridge, S., & Chapin, L. (2015). The internet of things: An overview. The Internet Society (ISOC), 80(15), 1–53. https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ISOC-IoT-Overview-20151221-en.pdf

Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: A literature review. Virtual Reality, 25(1), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8

Schweibenz, W. (2004). The development of virtual museums. ICOM News Magazine, 3(3), 1–2. https://icom.museum/en/ressource/the-development-of-virtual-museums/

Shaikat, A. S., Hussein, M. R., Tasnim, R., Zonayed, M., Jhara, S. S., Rahman, M. M., & Mokhter, A. H. (2024). An IoT enabled artifact protection system for museum using computer vision. Journal of Engineering Advancements, 5(4), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.38032/jea.2024.04.004

Stiles, K. (2003). Art and technology (A. Ameri, Trans.). Binab, (2), 144–161. https://B2n.ir/re6392 (Original work published 1996) (in Persian)

Sutherland, I. E. (1965, May). The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the IFIP Congress (Vol. 2, No. pp. 506-508).

Thrun, S., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Dellaert, F., Fox, D., ... & Schulz, D. (1999). MINERVA: A second-generation museum tour-guide robot. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Vol. 3). IEEE.

Varitimiadis, S., Kotis, K., Skamagis, A., Tzortzakakis, A., Tsekouras, G., & Spiliotopoulos, D. (2020). Towards implementing an AI chatbot platform for museums. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cultural Informatics, Communication & Media Studies (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.12681/cicms.2732