Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to Improve Product Design using Qualitative Characteristics Analysis* Case study: Tehran Secondary School Furniture

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Industrial Design Department, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A. graduate of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a very helpful method to analyze the customer's desires with solutions of problems along a new design to generate high quality and competitive developed products to generate high quality and competitive ergonomic products and processes. This method employs a wide range of applications for translating customers’ needs into technical requirements to fulfil customer satisfaction. In the present study a QFD analysis was performed to improve design of school furniture in Tehran. The study extended the widely used QFD into a complex set of customers’ needs about the school furniture and showed the step-by-step application of QFD that focuses on the first matrix or House of Quality (HOQ) matrix. In the first set of analysis, the quality requirements were considered, and the issues of scheduling were subsequently evaluated. The analysis was started by identifying the problem statements, specifying the objectives and designing the scopes of school furniture. One hundred sixty boys and girls students of three high schools, located in three different areas of Tehran, participated in the present study. Student’s requirements were collected and translated into the technical requirements using QFD. Data gathering was carried out through survey, questionnaire distribution and structured interview. The collected data were then analysed to find the best solutions of the problems. The results of HOQ matrix, were used to provide suggestions and solutions to decrease the problems. From students’ points of view comfortable seat was the most important issue which may cause back, neck and leg pains. The other important issues were height of the table and chair and comfortable support. Moreover, dimensions of table and chair, space for tools, ease of use and enough space in book bookshelf, appropriate slope, additional equipment and no damage to clothes were placed in the next level of priorities. Also the results showed that student’s requests are quite simple and feasible with low cost. As, students’ prior request from designers is to solve ergonomic and dimensional problems. Almost all of the classroom equipment have been found with low quality in comparison with company’s products. The latter shows that the equipment, with priority of tables and chairs, need to be improved immediately because low quality school furniture may cause several serious physical or mental problems for students. The study also showed that QFD method can help demonstrators to ascertain inter-relationship between operation requirements and measurements of performance. The current study indicated that how furniture defects can lead to student satisfying or exhausting during education process. According to the HOQ, improvement of table and chair designs may solve furniture problems and satisfy students, but confirmation of this issue needs a time course analysis study after using the product. QFD has been proven to be an effective means of process and product deployments, and it is a proper method to solve problems along with school furniture in the future. This study provides basic information about student and their requirements in classroom by which future studies could solve student's problems with school furniture and equipment.

Keywords


اسماعیلی، سید علی و ابراهیمی، عطری و احمد، هاشمی و جواهری، سید علی اکبر (1386)، بررسی تناسب ارگونومی میز و نیمکت مدارس با برخی اندازه های آنتروپومتری دانش آموزان. مجموعه مقالات ششمین همایش بین المللی تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی. جزیره کیش. ایران، صص 6-4.
خرم، مهدی و مسدد، هاشم و صادقی، نایینی، حسن (1384)، بررسی استانداردهای تجهیزات مدارس( با تاکید بر میز و صندلی مدارس)، طرح پژوهشی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران و سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور، جلد اول.
داوود پور، زهرا و کلهر، مهدی (1392)، استفاده از گسترش عملکرد کیفیت (QFD) به منظور انعکاس خواسته ها و تمایلات مردمی در فضاهای شهری، نمونه موردی: بوستان مهدی در شهر قم، مجله معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر، شماره 11، صص 222-209.
رضایی، کامران و آشتیانی، حمیدرضا و هوشیار، محمد (1380)، QFDرویکردی مشتری مدار به طرح ریزی و بهبود کیفیت محصول، انتشارات آتنا، تهران.
زمانی، عشرت و نصر اصفهانی، احمدرضا ( 1386)، ویژگی های فیزیکی و فرهنگی فضاهای آموزشی دوره ابتدایی چهار کشور پیشرفته جهان از دید دانش آموزان ایرانی و والدین آنها، فصلنامه نوآوری های آموزشی، سال 6 ، شماره 23، صص 55-84.
مرتضوی، شهرناز (1376)، فضاهای آموزشی از دیدگاه روانشناسی محیط، انتشارات سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور. منصوری، علیرضا و داوری، زهرا (1382)، ابزاری برای انتقال صدای مشتری به فرایند طراحی و توسعه محصول QFD، شیخ بهایی، شماره 3، صص 91-72.
میرزایی، رمضان (1375)، تعیین مشخصه های آتروپومتریک استاتیکی دانش آموزان پسر شهری 6- 18 سال استان سیستان و بلوچستان به منظور طراحی تجهیزات آموزشی بر مبنای اصول ارگونومی، شماره 7، صص 36-39.
Akao, Y (1990), Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Translated by Glenn Mazur Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press, 1-15.
Akao, Y (1994), "Recent approach of quality function deployment," In QFD: The customer-driven approach to quality planning and development, edited by Mizuno, S., and Akao, Y, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, 25-216.
Brotchner, J., and Mazur, G (1999), Brand engineering using Kansei Engineering and QFD, QFD Institute, 1-24.
Carnevalli, J. A. and Miguel, P. C. (2008), Review, Analysis and Classification of the Literature on QFD_ Types of Researche, Difficulties and Benefits, International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 737-754.
Celik, M., Cebi, S. and Kahraman, C., Er, I. D (2009), An Integrated Fuzzy QFD Model Proposal on Routing of Shipping Investment Decisions in Crude Oil Tanker Market, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3, Part 2), 6227-6235.
Gargione, L.A (1999), "Using quality function deployment (QFD) in the design phase of an apartment construction project", Paper presented at IGLC-7, 26-28 July 1999, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 357-368.
Gento, A. M., Minambres, M.D., Redondo, A. and Perez, M.E (2001), "QFD Application in a Service Environment: A New Approach in Risk Management in a University", Operational Research, An International Journal 1 (2), 115-132.
Gonzalez, M (2001), QFD: A Road to Listening to Customer Needs, 1st ed, Mexico: McGraw-Hill, 42-50, 69-77, 107-126. Gonzalez, M., Quesada, G., and Bahill, T (2003),"Improving Product Design Using Quality Function Deployment: The School Furniture Case in Developing Countries", Quality Engineering 16(1), 47–58.
Haapalainen, M., Kivisto-Rahnasto, J., and Mattila, M (2000), "Ergonomic design of non-powered hand tools: An application of quality function deployment (QFD)", Occupational Ergonomics 2 (3), 179-190.
Kahraman, C., Ertay, T. and Buyukozkan, G (2006), A Fuzzy Optimization Model for QFD Planning Process Using Analytic Network Approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 171(2), 390-411.
Li, M (2012), "The Extension of Quality Function Deployment Based on 2-Tuple Linguistic Representation Model for Product Design under Multigranularity Linguistic Environment", Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Volume 2012, 1-18.
Liu, E. and Zhang, L (2000), Quality Function Deployment Theories and Methods-Review on research progress, System Engineering, Vol.18, Feb.2000, 1-5.
Mazur, G (1996b), "The Application Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to Design a Curse in Total Quality Management (TQM) at the University Michigan College of Engineering, (1996)," Paper presented at International Conference on Quality, ICQ '96- Yokohama, Japan, JUSE, October, 15-18.
Mazur, G (1996a), "Voice of Customer Analysis: A Modern System of Front-End QFD Tools, with Case Studies", Paper presented at Proceeding of AQC 1997, Orlando, May 5-7, 1997, ASQC.
QFD Institute (2008), QFD: Transactions from the Twentieth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Santa Fe, NM, October 24, 2008.
Qu, L (2000), "Review on Quality Function Deployment Technology and Application", Journal of Industrial Engineering 14, 52-60.
Quesada, G (1997), Design of Quality Strategies Focused on Customer Service (ECSEC), Unpublished dissertation, Cartago, Costa Rica Institute of Technology of Costa Rica, 50–57.
Terninko, J (1997), Step-by-Step QFD: Customer- Driven Product Design, St. Lucie press, Nottingham, 1-180.
Utne, I. B (2009), Improving the Environmental Performance of the Fishing Fleet by Use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(8), 724-731.
Verma, D., and Knezevic, J (1996), "A Fuzzy weighted wedge mechanism for feasibility assessment of system reliability during conceptual design", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 83 (2), 179-187.