Explanation of the process and benefits of service design with participatory design approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Due to the role of participation in service design, the importance of the concept participatory design approach is increasing in this area. In the literature in this area is mentioned many benefits of using participatory approach in the service design. some of these are: 1. development of different and new services with better values for users, 2. reducing the time of development services, 3. User education, 4. Long-term and better relationships between service providers and customers. But some questions still remained unanswered in the participatory design process in the service design and benefits of this approach ahead in this direction. So the aim of this study is to investigate the process of participatory design in service design projects based on tools and techniques (And possibly achieve a comprehensive process in this area), also to survey the benefits which are originated from the selected tools. The other purpose of this study is to show the importance of co-design in service design process. The research method in this paper is a qualitative analysis based on case study. For this, four projects have been selected in the field of service design from scientific articles as case studies that three of them are based on participatory design and one of them is based on a different approach. The important result of this research showed that we can probably identify a three-step process in all participatory service design projects to introduce it to designers in this area. The steps of this suggested process are: 1.preparation of operative groups 2.collective ideas 3.participatory review and extracting the ideas. The first phase of this three-step process also is diagnosed in three separate steps that are as follows: 1.Selected the type of group or groups participants 2.Recognition of diverse mental models of participants 3.informing participants with methods and objectives of the project. So the inputs in the first stage are different subjective assumptions and outputs are mindfulness participants to the matter. The last phase of this process also has three steps: 1.review 2.completion 3.selection. So at this stage (participatory review and extracting the ideas), Input are diverse ideas and output is a selective idea that is selected with the participation of all participants. Also with a comparative analysis of innovation areas in service design (which are known 7P and are included: Place, Product, price, promotion, Participants, Physical evidence and Process) with participatory design tools, it was found that the use of participatory design tools has positive effects in these areas. Finally, to assess the process proposed in this paper, the process of an execution project and the results of this were evaluated. The author’s suggestion for future research in the field of participatory design is to measure the result of the comparative analysis of innovation areas in service design with participatory design tools practically with executive projects to be aware of the positive impact of it and can be compared its influence with the implementation of other similar methods.

Keywords

References

Alam, I (2002), An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.30, No. 3, pp. 250-261.
Booms, B & Bitner, M. J (1981), Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms, Marketing of Services, James H. Donnelly and William R. George, eds, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 47-51.
Bossen, C; Dindler, C & Iversen, O.S (2016), Evaluation in Participatory Design: A Literature Survey, PDC '16 Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference, Vol.1, pp.151-160.
Gloppen, J (2009), Service design leadership, first Nordic conference on service design and service innovation,?????, pp. 1-16.
Gustafsson, A & Johnson M. D (2003), Competing in a service economy: how to create a competitive advantage through service development and innovation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Kleinsmann, M & Valkenburg R (2008), Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects, Design Studies, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 369-386.
Kotler, P & Armstrong, G (2006), Principles of marketing, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson Education. نقل از (اسماعیل زاده، معصومه، قدوسی نژاد، زهرا. مروری بر روش های مشارکت کاربران در طراحی خدمات. اولین کنفرانس ملی طراحی خدمات. اردیبهشت 1394).  
Kujala, S (2003), User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-16.
Lucy; K (2011), Designing for service as one way of designing services, International Journal of Design, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 41-52.
Mager, B & Sung, T.J (2011), Special issue editorial: Designing for services, International Journal of Design, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1-3.
Malinverni, L; Mora-Guiard,  J & Pares, N (2016), Towards Methods  for  Evaluating  and  Communicating  Participatory Design: A Multimodal Approach, Journal of  Human  Computer Studies,  pp. 1-33, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.004.
Nakki, P(2012), Service co-design using online ideation and face to face testing: case city adventure, Serv Des 2012 third Nordic conference on service design,???????? pp. 177-188
Prahalad, C.K & Ramaswamy, V (2004), Co-creation Experiences: The New Practice in Value Creation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 5-14.
Sanders, E. B(2005), Information, inspiration and co-creation, 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen, Germany, pp. 1-14.
Sanders, E. B. N; Brandt, E& Binder, T (2010), A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design, 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, New York, NY, USA, pp. 195-198.
Shostack, G. L (1987), Service Positioning Through Structural Change, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 34-43.
Steen, M; Manshot, M & De Koning, N (2011), Benefits of co-design in service design projects, International Journal of Design, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 53-60.
Voss, C & Zomerdijk, L (2007), Innovation in Experiential Services – An Empirical View, In: DTI (ed). Innovation in Services, London: DTI, pp.97-134.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts
Volume 23, Issue 2
July 2018
Pages 119-129

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics