Beauty, the generous enemy of art! Analytical study of “Art after Philosophy”

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

faculty member of sepehr university of Art in Isfahan

Abstract

Joseph Kosuth (Born in 1945, Ohio) -American critic and theorist of art and follower of “Art and Language movement” in America- in his Article entitled “Art after Philosophy” (1969) not Only Beauty as Philosophy of Art but also the entire of Past Philosophy of Wittgenstein deserves rejection and away from Art. according to Wittgenstein’s views, Kosuth defines the meaning of each Phenomenon in its function; Also, He gives priority to function and meaning instead the form; but Kosuth moves on philosophy and defines the art beyond the language of philosophy by limiting the definition of language in the artistic arena. By an anti-Hegelian approach, He explains the condition of passing of art from philosophy and its independence: Comparability of art with an analytical proposition Somehow that the art stabilizes its existence by "Tautology" (it means Art is as Art) and gets independence and power by the term “say nothing except art”. In Kosuth’s view, the essence of art is as function of art, and the function of art is as artist's theoretical propositions. The approved artwork by Kosuth is an analytical proposition that remains in its own arena (art), and with showing the explicit intention of the artist doesn’t refer to any subject outside of its text. Kosuth considers "being an artist" as " being a questioner” of "the essence of art". A questioning that reveals the functional concepts of art, adds something to the concept and language of art or is a new proposition that has not existed before.
Joseph Kosuth in this Article defines the Art that regardless of any medium and regardless of the Appearance and shape, the Art which is going beyond Philosophy and making Philosophical Language on the bases of its function. The New Art entitled “Conceptual Art” will replace the past philosophy and past Art also will change Art History, the view of community to Art and importance of Media (Artistic Medium). In this Art, ”Beauty” which previously was considered as an essential part of Art Work, henceforth it will not guarantee and warranty anymore by Art and Art will be produced and explained by science and reasonable Proposition. Joseph Kosuth relying on his definitions, knows Marsel Duchamp (1887 - 1968) the only Artist who could get away from Philosophy and Aesthetic in his work to access Concept. In the opinion of Joseph Kosuth, “Art of Post Duchamp” will be Conceptual in its essence and each work of Post Duchamp in each Medium and manufacturer Object will be discussed in the field of Conceptual Art.
This paper, with an analytical approach and in three general sections, reviews The evolution of the “definition of aesthetics” and The relationship between beauty and science, philosophy and art; Also, it evaluates Kosuth's theoretical elements in the article "Art after Philosophy" and his critical attitude about Beauty and the art of pre-Duchamp. In addition, This article reveals limited definition of art following the analytical-linguistic propositions and the questionable essence of art in Joseph Kosuth's opinion.

Keywords

References

احمدی، بابک (1386)، حقیقت و زیبایی؛ درس‌های فلسفۀ هنر، نشر مرکز، تهران.
بیردزلی، مونروسی و هاسپرس، جان (1387)، تاریخ و مسائل زیباشناسی، ترجمۀ محمد سعید حنایی کاشانی، نشر هرمس، تهران.
پاکباز، روئین (1381)، دایره‌المعارف هنر، انتشارات فرهنگ معاصر، تهران.
دورانت، ویل (1385)، لذات فلسفه، ترجمۀ عباس زریاب خوئی، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، تهران.
کابان، پی‌یر (1380)، مارسل دوشان؛ پنجره‌ای گشوده بر چیز دیگر، ترجمۀ لیلی گلستان، نشر و پژوهش فرزان روز، تهران.
کاسیرر، ارنست (1370)، فلسفه روشنگری، ترجمۀ یدالله موقن، انتشارات نیلوفر، تهران.
کانت، ایمانوئل (1362)، سنجش خرد ناب، ترجمۀ م.ش. ادیب سلطانی، انتشارات امیرکبیر، تهران.
گات، بریس و لوپس، دومینیک مک‌آیور (1389)، دانشنامۀ زیبایی‌شناسی، ترجمۀ جمعی از مترجمان، فرهنگستان هنر، تهران.
لینتن، نوبرت (1382)، هنر مدرن، ترجمۀ علی رامین، نشر نی، تهران.
ولک، رنه (1373)، تاریخ نقد جدید، جلد 1، ترجمۀ سعید ارباب شیرانی، انتشارات نیلوفر، تهران.
ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ یوزف یوهان (۱۳۷۱)، رسالۀ منطقی ـ فلسفی، ترجمۀ میر‌شمس‌الدین ادیب‌سلطانی، انتشارات امیرکبیر، تهران.
هگل، گئورگ ویلهلم فریدریش (1385)، درس‌گفتارهایی پیرامون فلسفۀ زیبایی‌شناسی، ترجمۀ زیبا جبلی، نشر آب‌نگاه، تهران.
هگل، گئورگ ویلهلم فریدریش (1391)، مقدمه‌ای بر زیبایی‌شناسی، ترجمۀ ستاره معصومی، نشر آرشام، تهران.
 
Foulquie, P (1982), Dictionnaire de la Langue Philosophique, PUF, Paris.
Nietzsche, F (1967), The Will to power, Traw.Kaufmann, New York.
Kosuth, Joseph (1969), Art after Philosophy, in: http://lot.at/sfu_sabine_bitter/Art_After_Philosophy.pdf.
http://corner-college.com/udb/cproVozeFxParagraphs_on_Conceptual_Art._Sol_leWitt.pdf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_%26_Language.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Kosuth.
http://viola.informatik.uni-bremen.de/typo/fileadmin/media/lernen/LeWittSentencesConceptual.pdf.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts
Volume 23, Issue 3
September 2018
Pages 103-114

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics