Clive Bell’s Aesthetic Theory of Significant Form in the Light of Piet Mondrian’s Neo-Plasticism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Art Education, Martyrs of Mecca Higher Education Center, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Although Clive Bell’s aesthetic formalism has had a significant impact on development of later modern art theories in the twentieth century, in the last decades its authenticity has been noticeably declined due to many objections raised against it. In spite of significant contributions of scholars to elucidate and resolve shortcomings and ambiguities of Bell’s theory of significant form, yet the nature of his key conception ‘significant form,’ mutually and circularly defined in terms of another controversial term ‘aesthetic emotion,’ is obscure. In this regard, many vague points in respect to the relationship between aesthetic theory of formalism and modern art can be proposed that need to be addressed. Above all, how Bell’s formalism has been construed and employed by Modern theorists and artists, particularly in case of Piet Mondrian as one of the most prominent formalist and modernist pure abstract painters of the first half of the 20th century? Indeed, this article aims at evaluating the authenticity of this hypothesis that ambiguities of Bell’s theory of formalism will be resolved, though to some extent, by scrutinizing this theory in the light of Mondrian’s theory of Neo-Plasticism; an enriched art theory which is basically shaped by many philosophical doctrines (especially Plato, Hegel, Schopenhauer, and theosophists) and artistic theories (particularly Cubism and De Stijl), artistic movements which they themselves are founded and developed based on tenets of formalism.
Therefore, this article aims to further shed light on ambiguities of Bell’s theory of significant form. To this end, it firstly attempts to explain the analogies and disparities between Bell’s theory and Mondrian’s Neo-Plasticism in respect to two key conceptions: significant form and aesthetic emotion, and secondly to further illuminate some of the ambiguities overly discussed by scholars in regard to this polemical theory.
The data for this article has been collected by using library research (mainly latest articles and books). However, for the sake of comparison, original and first published version of Bell’s theory of formalism, published in his seminal book titled Art, has been used. Analysis and results have been written by using intertextual approach and a descriptive-analytical method to examine Mondrian’s account on Bell’s key conceptions “aesthetic formalism” and “aesthetic emotion” and the vicious circularity found in their definition.
At the end of this article, it becomes evident that there are intimate analogies between Bell’s theory of significant form and Mondrian’s Neo-Plasticism in respect to conceptions of plastic means (formal elements of his art) and equilibrium, or new harmony. It becomes clear that Mondrian in his writings explicitly refers to Bell’s key notions significant form and aesthetic emotion and he defines the former in the light of his Neo-Plastic principles. Moreover, it will be deduced that unlike Bell, Mondrian’s rendition of Bell’s notions significant form and aesthetic emotion is discharged of any circularity. Lastly, the results of this article clarify the formalist roots of Neo-Plasticism, which have been mostly construed in relation to other artistic theories and philosophical doctrines.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

پاکباز، رویین (1379)، دایرة المعارف هنر (نقاشی، پیکره سازی و هنر گرافیک)، تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
جمالی، مریم (1394)، مقدمه‌اى بر مفهوم فرم و فرمالیسم در هنر مدرن، فلسفه تحلیلی، 12(28)، 5-33.
فلاح زاده، علی (1399الف)، عوامل تأثیرگذار بر شکل گیری هنر انتزاعی ناب نئوپلاستیک پیت موندریان، رهپویه هنر/هنرهای تجسمی، 3(1)، 57-69. ‎doi: 10.29252/Rahpooyesoore.6.3.57
فلاح ‌زاده، علی (1399ب)، نظریات هنری پیت موندریان در باب شش اصل نقاشی نئوپلاستیک، دوماهنامۀ علمی تخصصی پژوهش در هنر و علوم انسانی، 5 (8)، 27-15.
فلاح زاده، علی و رهبرنیا، زهرا. (1401). انطباق تحولات نظری پیت موندریان با عناصر نقاشی نئوپلاستیک طی بازه زمانی 1927تا 1944، نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی، 27(2)، 59-69.
doi: 10.22059/jfava.2021.328958.666775
Bell, C. (1914). Art. The University of Michigan: Frederick A, Stokes Company Publishers.
Carmean, E. A. (1979). Mondrian: the diamond compositions [Exhibition catalogue]. USA: National Gallery of Art.
Dickie, G. T. (1965). Clive Bell and the method of Principia Ethica. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 5(2), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/5.2.139
Edwards, S., & Wood, P. (2004). Art of the avant-gardes. Yale University Press in association with the Open University. Ellegood, A. (2013). Formalism Redefined. In Contemporary Art 1989 to the Present (pp. 84-94). UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fallahzadeh, A., & Gamache, G. (2018). Equilibrium and rhythm in Piet Mondrian’s Neo-Plastic compositions. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1525858
Gall, D. A. (2016). Formalist problems, realist solutions. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 50(1), 80-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.50.1.0080
Gould, C. S. (1994). Clive Bell on aesthetic experience and aesthetic truth. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 34(2), 124-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/34.2.124
Janaway, C., & Shapshay, S. (2020). Introduction. In S. M. Cahn, S. Ross, & S. L. Shapshay (Eds..), Aesthetics: A comprehensive anthology (pp. 1-17). John Wiley & Sons.
McLaughlin, T. M. (1977). Clive Bell's Aesthetic: Tradition and Significant Form. Journal of Aesthetic Art Critics, 35(4), 433-443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/430609
Mondrian, P. (1939-40). Liberation from Oppression in Art and Life. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 320-330). Thames and Hudson.
Mondrian, P. (1938). Art without Subject Matter. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 302-304). Thames and Hudson.
Mondrian, P. (1936). Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 288-300). Thames and Hudson.
Mondrian, P. (1931). The New Art—The New Life: The Culture of Pure Relationships. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 244-276). Thames and Hudson. Mondrian, P. (1926). General Principles of Neo-Plasticism. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 213-215). Thames and Hudson.
Mondrian, P. (1920). Neo-Plasticism: The General Principle of Plastic Equivalence. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 132-147). Thames and Hudson. Mondrian, P. (1919-20). Natural Reality and Abstract Reality. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 82-123). Thames and Hudson.
Mondrian, P. (1917). The New Plastic in Painting. In H. Holtzman & M. S. James (1986, Eds. and Trans.), The new art-the new life: the collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 27-74). Thames and Hudson.
Seuphor, M. (1956). Piet Mondrian: life and work. USA: HN Abrams.
Snyman, J. (1993). The significance and insignificance of Clive Bell’s formalism. Koers-Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 58(2), 127-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v58i2.687
Veen, L. A. (2017). Piet Mondrian on the Principles of Neo–Plasticism. International Journal of Art and Art History, 5(2), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijaah.v5n2p1
Warburton, N. (2003). The Art Question. USA & Canada: Routledge.
Weitz, M. (2013). Philosophy of the Arts. USA: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674436626
Zangwill, N. (1999). Feasible aesthetic formalism. Nous, 33(4), 610-629. doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2671957
Zeki, S. (2013). Clive Bell’s “Significant Form” and the neurobiology of aesthetics. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00730
URL1: https://www.kunstmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/compositie-met-groot-rood-vlak-geel-zwart-grijs-en-blauw?origin=gm/ (access date: 2023/11/05)
URL2: https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/3014/ (access date: 2023/11/05)
URL3: https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/40159 / (access date: 2023/11/05)
URL4: https://www.museum.nl/en/stedelijk-museum-amsterdam/showpiece/mondriaan-lozenge-composition/ (access date: 2023/11/05)
Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts
Volume 29, Issue 1
May 2024
Pages 23-36

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics