The Sublimity of Fragmented Past: Exploring the Relationship between Ruin and Sublimity in Piranesi's Etchings Based on Kantian Aesthetics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Visual Arts, Yazd University, Yazd.

2 Master of Logic, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

 
There are only a few works you can find in Piranesi's Etching that are not related to the "past". In his work, "ruin" is the most frequent theme. This article targets the ways ruin is depicted in Piranesi's work. Thus, by considering Piranesi’s prime and typical works and moving through his varying embodiments of ruin, this article will explain the different aspects of these representations and describes, the visuals of the way ruin is shown in his works. Based on Kant's theory of aesthetics in "The Critique of Judgment" and describing the concept of "sublimity" within that theoretical framework, it’s been attempted to provide the ground for answering "why" this type of representation reflects sublimity.
The descriptive-analytical findings from this research indicate that fragmentality is the main feature in showing "the past" in Piranesi's work. Some of his works have archaeological approach, and by them, Piranesi tries to give us an "image" from the past. The dominance of the visual aspect and the frequency of the designs and their expansive range, from fireplace details to monuments and urban design, show that, in Piranesi's view, these pictures are beside each other in a sequence to build a complete picture of "the past". Although "phrases" come in to help the visual with accuracy and detail in some of these pictures, the fragmented quality of the contents of these depictions and the distance between the different types of them are not explained, as if this past would always represent itself as "lost". The recurring theme of "ruin" is also confirming of such an approach. Shape-wise, the most prominent manifestation of Piranesi's "ruins" is their enormous dimensions. Such depictions of memorials are recounting of the "mathematically sublime" in Kant's aesthetic system. As if in the face of "the sublimity" of these ruins, imagination fails to comprehend the mounting perceptual apprehensions. Also, ruins, in different ways, bespeak the power of the passing of time as a natural force. The sign of decadence on these ruins, in the forms of distortion of segments and growth of moss and greens, on another level, can intrigue experiencing sublimity in the audience. This experience is reminding of the "dynamically sublime" in Kant's aesthetics, where the subject feels fear when confronted by the power of nature. This fear, existing in Piranesi’s memorial, can be especially observed in Piranesi’s prison series. Prisons have nested spaces that evoke the impossibility of escaping such powers. In addition, by reviewing the content of the pictures and Piranesi’s text, it is apparent that this failure to comprehend is caused by facing the sublimity of the Roman Empire. Piranesi, in his different works, has attempted to depict this lost glory through pictures and words. However, this civilization and its example in Rome are so “sublime” in his view that they are depicted as a “fragmented” matter.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • اکو، امبرتو (1390)، تاریخ زیبایی، ترجمة هما بینا، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگستان هنر.
  • - برنهام، داگلاس (1398)، درآمدی بر نقد قوة حکم کانت، ترجمة محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، تهران: نشر نی.
  • - پیرانزی، جیووانی باتیستا (1396)، زندان‌ها (له کارچری). ترجمة پویان روحی، تهران: کتابکدة کسری.
  • - کاسیرر، ارنست (1389)، فلسفة روشنگری، ترجمة یدالله موقن، تهران: انتشارات نیلوفر.
  • - کانت، امانوئل (1386)، نقد قوة حکم، ترجمة عبدالکریم رشیدیان، تهران: نشر نی.
  • - هو، جان (1396)، دیباچه، درکتاب زندان ها (له کارچری)، ترجمة پویان روحی، تهران: کتابکدة کسری، تهران: نشر نی. 14-9.
  • - Augustyn, J. (2000). Subjectivity in the Fictional Ruin: The Caprice Genre. The Romanic Review,
  • 91(4), 433
  • -457. doi: 10.1215/26885220-91.4.433. - Beiser, Frederick C. (2009). Diotima's children: German aesthetic rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573011.001.0001.
  • - Dixon, S. M. (1999). Piranesi and Francesco Bianchini: "capricci" in the service of pre-scientific archaeology. Art history, 22(2), 184- 213. doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00149.
  • - Doran, Robert (2015), Theory of the Sublime. Form Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316182017.
  • - Durand, Carroll. (1988). The Apogee of Perspective in the Theatre: Ferdinando Bibiena's Scena per angolo. Theatre Research International, 45(13), 21-29.
  • - Ficacci, Luigi. (1999). Giovanni Battista Piranesi: The Complete Etchings. TASCHEN.
  • - Frierson, Patririck (2011). Introduction. In Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings. Ed. P.Frierson & P. Guyer, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • - Huxley, A. (1949). Prisons. With the ‘Carceri’ Etchings of G. B. Piranesi. Zeitlin and Ver Brugge: Los Angeles. - Ipek Ek, F. ,& Sengel, D. (2007). PIRANESI BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND SUBLIME. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 24(1), 17-34.
  • - Kant, Immanuel. (2012). Beobachtungen ueber das Gefuehl des Schoenen und Erhabenen. Leipzig: Insel-Verlag. - Kantor-Kazovsky, Lola (2007). Displeasure of Ruins: Piranesi and the Monuments of Ancient Rome. Apollo, 546(72), 47–53.
  • - Minor, Heather Hyde. (2012). G. B. Piranesi’s Diverse Maniere and the Natural History of Ancient Art. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 56(4), 323-351.
  • - Naginski, Erika (2008). Preliminary thoughts on Piranesi and Vico. Anthropology and Aesthetics. Vol. 53(4), 151-167. - Piranesi, Giovanni, Battista. (1972). Piranesi: Drawings and etchings at the Avery Architectural Library. NewYork: Columbia University Press.
  • - Roncato, Sergio. (2007). Piranesi and the infinite prisons. Spatial vision, 21(1), 3-18. doi: 10.1163/156856807782753895.
  • - Rosenblum, Robert (1967). Transformations in Late Eighteenth-Century Art. Princeton: Hugh Honour. - Shaw, Philip (2017). The Sublime. London: Routledge.
  • - Spuybroek, Lars (2015). The Acrobatics of the Figure: Piranesi and Magnificence. In Dr J. G. Wallis de Vries (ed.), ARCHESCAPE: The Piranesi Flights, 1001 Publishers, 5-11.
  • - Stafford, Barbara Maria (1996) Bare versus Prismatic Style: Newton, Piranesi and Eighteenth- Century Theories of Abstraction in Art and Science. The Romantic Imagination: Literature and Art in England and Germany, Ed. Frederick Burwick and Jürgen Klein, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • - Wendorf, Richard. (2001). Piranesi's Double Ruin. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 34(1). 161-180. - Winckelmann, J. Joachim (2013). Thoughts on the Imitation of Greek Works in Painting and the Art of Sculpture. In D. Carter (Trans.), Johann Joachim Winckelmann on Art, Architecture, and Archaeology, 31–56. doi:10.1515/9781571138460-003.