Role of Design Thinking in Guiding Innovation Through Influencing Knowledge Bases

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Faculty member, Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art university of isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Design thinking is introduced as a method to achieve innovation in conditions with high uncertainty and complexity. This feature has led this method to innovations welcomed by companies operating in unknown and turbulent markets. Nevertheless, the development of theoretical knowledge about design thinking has not been accompanied by its accelerated use and has created a lack in its sustainable implementation; A problem that has led to the superficial and cross-sectional implementation of this approach. In the meantime, the place of design thinking in knowledge-based innovation is one of the fields that, despite some studies, remains unknown. Considering the development of knowledge-based innovation in recent years, it is necessary to explain the effect of innovation models on it. Based on an exploratory approach, this research has tried to explain the mechanism of the effect of this method through the development of analytical, synthetic, and symbolic knowledge bases by analyzing the orientation of four kinds of design thinking to knowledge-based innovation. For this purpose, design thinking experts who have had a significant experience in connection with innovative companies implementing this approach were consulted, and information was collected with the help of open and semi-structured interviews. According to the research structure of multi-case study, the data were monitored through cross-case analysis to identify recurring views among the results of the interviews. Also, to achieve more accurate and reliable estimates of the results, the collected data were triangulated. The findings of the research about the impact of design thinking on knowledge-based innovation were presented in the form of four discussed types. The mechanism of the effect of design thinking on knowledge-based innovation can be expressed on two levels. At the first level, it is design thinking methodology that enables intuitive and speculative behaviors to identify what can be possible in four different approaches. By relying on the logic of abduction, design thinking develops a different form of encountering the surrounding world, which is different from conventional analytical approaches. This form can strengthen the exploratory capabilities of the organization. At the second level, design thinking with the ability to develop all three analytical, synthetic and symbolic knowledge bases through different types, affects the innovation of the knowledge base. Our findings showed that while the user-oriented type mainly enriches the analytical knowledge base, two types of acceleration and creative trust cause the development of the combined knowledge base. Finally, the innovation of meaning has a direct relationship with the development of knowledge of the symbolic base. The summary of the results shows that while design thinking has the capacity to influence knowledge-based innovation through different types, due to the limitations caused by the process structure, this view is not able to explain and guide the capacity of all the mentioned types in the path of innovation and needs to be revised. Considering the current research that tries to redefine design thinking through the lens of dynamic capabilities, we suggest expanding the studies of this theoretical current to overcome the mentioned lack.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aamodt, A., & Nygård, M. (1995). Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge—An AI perspective on their integration. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 16(3), 191-222.‏ Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California management review, 50(1), 25-56.‏ Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
‏ Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.‏ Cabello, A., Baldessarelli, G., & Tucci, C. L. (2016). Enhancing Absorptive Capacity-The Case of Design Thinking. Academy of Management Proceedings, 16(1), 167-182.‏ DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.16728abstract
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014). Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 403-423.‏ Cautela, C., Simoni, M., & Moran, P. (2022). Microfoundations of dynamic design capabilities: An empirical analysis of “excellent” Italian design firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1), 3-23. DOI:‏ 10.1111/jpim.12592
Cousins, B. (2018). Validating a design thinking strategy: merging design thinking and absorptive capacity to build a dynamic capability and competitive advantage. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 102-120.‏ DOI:10.24840/2183-0606_006.002_0006
Davis, J., Docherty, C. A., & Dowling, K. (2016). Design thinking and innovation: Synthesising concepts of knowledge co-creation in spaces of professional development. The Design Journal, 19(1), 117-139.‏ Dell'Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R., & Zurlo, F. (2020). Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 324-344. DOI:‏ 10.1111/caim.12353
Devitt, F., & Robbins, P. (2013). Design, thinking and science. In Design Science: Perspectives from Europe: European Design Science Symposium, EDSS 2012, Leixlip, Ireland, December 6, 2012, Revised Selected Papers 3 (pp. 38-48). Springer International Publishing.
Dong, A., Garbuio, M., & Lovallo, D. (2016). Generative sensing: A design perspective on the microfoundations of sensing capabilities. California Management Review, 58(4), 97-117.‏ Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), 425-437.‏ Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120.‏ Grillitsch, M., Schubert, T., & Srholec, M. (2019). Knowledge base combinations and firm growth. Research Policy, 48(1), 234-247.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.009
Inayatullah, S. (1998). Causal layered analysis: Poststructuralism as method. Futures, 30(8), 815-829.‏ Lattemann, C., Guerrero, R., Redlich, B., & Fischer, S. (2020). Development of Absorptive Capacities through Design Thinking and Design Knowledge in SMEs. Peresented In Wirtschaftsinformatik (Zentrale Tracks), Potsdam, Germany, (pp. 386-401).‏ DOI:10.30844/wi_2020_d2-lattemann
Leavy, B. (2010). Design thinking–a new mental model of value innovation. Strategy & leadership, 38(3), 5-14.‏ Llamas, Alan Cabello. (2015). Human-Centered Innovation Processes the Case of Design Thinking in Nacent and Lager Firms. Ph.D. Dissertation. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.‏ Liedtka, J. (2018) Why Design Thinking Works, Harvard Business Review, 23(4), 130-142. DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.11.019
Liedtka, J. (2020). Putting technology in its place: Design thinking’s social technology at work. California Management Review, 62(2), 53–83. DOI:10.1177/0008125619897391
Lissack, M. (2019). Understanding is a design problem: Cognizing from a designerly thinking perspective. Part 1. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(3), 231-246.‏ DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.11.019
Magistretti, S., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2021). Framing the microfoundations of design thinking as a dynamic capability for innovation: Reconciling theory and practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 645-667.‏ DOI:10.1111/jpim.12586
Magistretti, S., Pham, C. T. A., & Dell'Era, C. (2021). Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation. Industrial Marketing Management, 97(1), 59-70.‏ DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.014
Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.‏ Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.‏ Mostofa, S. M., Othman, R., Mukherjee, D., & Hasan, K. K. (2020). A comprehensive framework of design thinking approach in knowledge management: A review in academic context. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(2), 281-294.‏ DOI:10.15503/jecs2020.2.281.294
Ojasalo, K., Koskelo, M., & Nousiainen, A. K. (2015). Foresight and service design boosting dynamic capabilities in service innovation. In The handbook of service innovation (pp. 193-212). Springer, London.‏ Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.‏ Prud'homme van Reine, P. (2017). The culture of design thinking for innovation. Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 56-80.‏ Roberts, J. P., Fisher, T. R., Trowbridge, M. J., & Bent, C. (2016). A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthcare, 4(1), 11-14. Rylander, A. (2009). Design thinking as knowledge work: Epistemological foundations and practical implications. Design Management Journal, 4(1), 7-19.‏ Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).
‏ 151-167 Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.‏ Thoring, K., & Müller, R. (2011). Creating knowledge in design thinking. In The relationship of process steps and knowledge types. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research, Delft, Netherlands, (pp. 1-9).‏ Verganti, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.‏ Verganti, R. (2018). Overcrowded: Designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas. The MIT Press.‏ DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035361.001.0001
Verganti, R., Dell’Era, C., & Swan, K. S. (2021). Design thinking: Critical analysis and future evolution. Journal of product innovation management, 38(6), 603-622.‏ DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12610