The Psychological Study of the Visual Literacy of the Logo (sign), Based on the Ancient Psychological Anima And Animus "Psychic" Based on Carl Gustav Yong's Theory of

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Student of Art Research, Faculty of Arts and Architecture / Tarbiat Modarres University / Tehran, Iran.

2 Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

In Yung's system, the entire personality or psychology of man consists of several distinct structures, which include self-conscious, unconscious and unconscious. In this system, there are two levels of unconsciousness: a higher surface and a deeper and more strongly penetrating surface. The most insolent and unattainable level of mental, collective consciousness, or subconscious metaphysical is the most unusual and controversial aspect of the Yung system. In a collective consciousness, man as a whole maintains human and pre-human experiences and transmits these congruent experiences to later generations. Therefore, the collective consciousness is the repository of all human-type experiences that have been transmitted to each of us. The collective subconscious has two main aspects: 1. Ancient patterns: these are mental patterns that help one to understand subconscious thoughts. 2-instincts. The old patterns are not real and completely transformed memories, but the old one is a pre-prepared pattern that remains to be seen in the face of a person's life before its contents are revealed. "Their old patterns are a system of images and emotions that give birth to the mind, and indeed the legacy of its psychological aspects. The background of the ancient patterns of dreams, myths, epics, mystical and folk stories, and generally literary works, are artistic, which are somehow associated with the unconscious and unconsciously involved in their creation. Some ancient patterns are more transformative than others are, so they constantly affect our psyche; these ancient patterns include: Anima, Animus. These ancient patterns can be visualized in a form. Symbolist history shows that anything can have a symbolic meaning; such as natural objects (rocks, plants, animals, humans, mountains, valleys, the sun, the moon, wind, water and fire) or what the hand An instrument is a human being (such as a house, a ship and a car) or even abstract forms (such as numbers, triangles, quadrangles, and circles). Symbol design, for example, is one of the most common and unique specialties in graphic design, and the design of the sign is very far away, where early humans for the transfer of concepts related to Hunting at one point recorded signs on the walls of the caves, and wherever it was seen, it transmitted a single concept to the audience and viewer. The preent study was conducted using descriptive-analytical method and data collection method in the form of a library. The purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze the pattern of two logos of sewage and firewall, recognizing the importance of the pattern of ancient patterns. Designing a logo as a visual expression that has an old background is itself a symbolic expression that can bring symbols that are derived from myths, ancient patterns and thoughts of our ancestors. For this, ancient patterns such as Anima and Animus can affect the design of logos. As can be seen in this research, it can be said that in designing the sewage logotype, the ancient effect of anima pattern and firewall logo, the ancient effect of the animus pattern is observed.

Keywords


اسماعیل پور، ابوالقاسم (1387)، اسطوره بیان نمادین، سروش، تهران.
اسنودن، روث (1392)، یونگ مفاهیم کلیدی، ترجمه افسانه شیخ الاسلام زاده، عطایی، تهران.
افشار مهاجر، کامران (1379)، حضور نمادها در هنرهای سنتی ایران، هنرنامه، شماره 8، صص 6-51 .
بیلسکر، ریچارد (1387)، اندیشه یونگ، ترجمه حسین پاینده، آشیان، تهران.
داندیس، دونیس اِ (1390)، مبادی سواد بصری، ترجمه مسعود سپهر، سروش، تهران.
ستاری، جلال (1374)، اسطوره و رمز مجموعه مقالات، سروش، تهران.
شوالیه، ژان و گربران، آلن (1387)، فرهنگ نمادها، ترجمه سودابه فضایلی، جلد5، جیحون، تهران.
شوالیه، ژان و گربران، آلن (1384)، فرهنگ نمادها، ترجمه سودابه فضایلی، جلد 1، جیحون، تهران.
شوالیه، ژان و گربران، آلن (1382)، فرهنگ نمادها، ترجمه سودابه فضایلی، جلد3، جیحون، تهران.
شولتز، دوان (1394)، نظریه های شخصیّت، ترجمه­ یوسف کریمی، ارسباران، تهران.
فقیهی­پور، جواد و افشارپور، منصور (1389)، بررسی میزان تأثیر گذاری آرم، نشان و درفش نظامی بر روحیه و اعتماد به نفس نظامیان، مدیریت- مدیریت نظامی، سال دهم، شماره 40، صص 125-176.
فیست، جس (1388)، نظریه های شخصیت، ترجمه یحیی سید محمدی،  روان، تهران.
مشکی، ساعد (1384)، نشانه ها، جست و جوهای مرتضی ممیز در نشانه، یساولی، تهران.
ممیز، مرتضی (1384)، چند و چون یک نشانه، هنر و معماری رشد آموزش هنر، شماره 5 ، صص10-13.
مورنو، آنتونی (1376)، یونگ، خدایان و انسان مدرن، ترجمه داریوش مهرجویی، مرکز، تهران.
هوهنه­گر، آلفرد (1366)، نمادها و نشانه ها، ترجمه علی صلح جو، سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، تهران.
یونگ، کارل گوستاو (1393)، انسان و سمبول هایش، ترجمه محمود سلطانیه، جامی، تهران.
Earle, Pliny (1845), ART. VI.--On the Inability to distinguish Colours, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1827-1924, 18, 346.
Resta, Robert G (1993), The crane's foot: The rise of the pedigree in human genetics, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2,4, pp.235-260.
Stearn, William T (1962), The origin of the male and female symbols of biology, Taxon, pp.109-113.